<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back Linking &#8211; Over Hyped or a Necessity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjthompson.net/394/back-linking-over-hyped-or-a-necessity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjthompson.net/394/back-linking-over-hyped-or-a-necessity/</link>
	<description>The Ramblings Of An Internet Marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:02:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ato8</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/394/back-linking-over-hyped-or-a-necessity/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Ato8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=394#comment-503</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Thanks for your resourceful blog. Very useful comments there about quality links and good on-page SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Thanks for your resourceful blog. Very useful comments there about quality links and good on-page SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy Moogan</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/394/back-linking-over-hyped-or-a-necessity/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy Moogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=394#comment-478</guid>
		<description>So to summarize do you need hundreds of back links?

Nope - you only need one more than your competitors :)

I couldn&#039;t agree more about the on-site SEO, I&#039;ve seen websites have huge increases in ranking just from small tweaks to the site itself.  Obviously depends on the competition but remember what the goal of Google is - to provide a great experience for their users.  If your site does this then you are half way there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So to summarize do you need hundreds of back links?</p>
<p>Nope &#8211; you only need one more than your competitors <img src='http://mjthompson.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more about the on-site SEO, I&#8217;ve seen websites have huge increases in ranking just from small tweaks to the site itself.  Obviously depends on the competition but remember what the goal of Google is &#8211; to provide a great experience for their users.  If your site does this then you are half way there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/394/back-linking-over-hyped-or-a-necessity/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=394#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Yes.. but if you want (one of your own pages) to get ranked in the search engines there&#039;s no two ways about it - you need backlinks. The more competitive your target keyword phrase, the better backlinks you&#039;ll need...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.. but if you want (one of your own pages) to get ranked in the search engines there&#8217;s no two ways about it &#8211; you need backlinks. The more competitive your target keyword phrase, the better backlinks you&#8217;ll need&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
