<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/</link>
	<description>The Ramblings Of An Internet Marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-599</guid>
		<description>I love the way you write.. Going to keep coming to your site now, found it on google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the way you write.. Going to keep coming to your site now, found it on google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Bolme</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Bolme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-598</guid>
		<description>I think many of the articles in &quot;problem status&quot; may actually be older articles. Interestingly, I received an email from Ezinearticles just today stating that one or more of my articles contained &quot;bad links.&quot; Since I have not posted on article on Ezinearticles for over a year (shame on me), my articles are older and one or more link in them has probably expired.  

I just didn&#039;t see any information about the &quot;age&quot; of the problem articles and I suspect it has to do mostly with older articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many of the articles in &#8220;problem status&#8221; may actually be older articles. Interestingly, I received an email from Ezinearticles just today stating that one or more of my articles contained &#8220;bad links.&#8221; Since I have not posted on article on Ezinearticles for over a year (shame on me), my articles are older and one or more link in them has probably expired.  </p>
<p>I just didn&#8217;t see any information about the &#8220;age&#8221; of the problem articles and I suspect it has to do mostly with older articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-576</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you Zack,  My point is that using statistics to suggest that 400 word article are of a poorer quality was not a good idea as statistics can be made to say anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you Zack,  My point is that using statistics to suggest that 400 word article are of a poorer quality was not a good idea as statistics can be made to say anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack Lim</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

I have found your blog through twitter and I would like to say that you have a fantastic blog that contains lots of useful information :)

I do not think that Christopher Knight is implying that articles that have less than 400 words are junk articles. I have read it somewhere in the EzineArticles blog that you can still submit articles that have less than 400 words if it is a quality article that contains good content.

Personally, I think that they will still approve any articles that have less than 400 words as long it is a good article that contains unique content. This might be a blessing in disguise as it will remove competitors who are using derivative content which means more traffics for marketers who are providing good articles.

Just my humble opinions :)

Zack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>I have found your blog through twitter and I would like to say that you have a fantastic blog that contains lots of useful information <img src='http://mjthompson.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I do not think that Christopher Knight is implying that articles that have less than 400 words are junk articles. I have read it somewhere in the EzineArticles blog that you can still submit articles that have less than 400 words if it is a quality article that contains good content.</p>
<p>Personally, I think that they will still approve any articles that have less than 400 words as long it is a good article that contains unique content. This might be a blessing in disguise as it will remove competitors who are using derivative content which means more traffics for marketers who are providing good articles.</p>
<p>Just my humble opinions <img src='http://mjthompson.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Zack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Touche Lance,

I find it morally reprehensible that you should stuff a comment with your links.. :)

But hey I still approved it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touche Lance,</p>
<p>I find it morally reprehensible that you should stuff a comment with your links.. <img src='http://mjthompson.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But hey I still approved it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Winslow</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Winslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Maybe we ought to all discuss feeding the third world children instead?

http://ezinearticles.com/?type=txcat&amp;cat=Arts-and-Entertainment:Humanities 

http://www.worldthinktank.net/pdfs/Honduras.pdf 

http://www.worldthinktank.net/pdfs/Nairobi.pdf 

Http://www.LanceWinslow.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we ought to all discuss feeding the third world children instead?</p>
<p><a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?type=txcat&amp;cat=Arts-and-Entertainment:Humanities" rel="nofollow">http://ezinearticles.com/?type=txcat&amp;cat=Arts-and-Entertainment:Humanities</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldthinktank.net/pdfs/Honduras.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldthinktank.net/pdfs/Honduras.pdf</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.worldthinktank.net/pdfs/Nairobi.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldthinktank.net/pdfs/Nairobi.pdf</a> </p>
<p>Http://www.LanceWinslow.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Baird</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Baird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-571</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see how things pan out from this.  After all EZA is (or was) considered a main weapon/tool for marketers, but let&#039;s see, and things like this are good for throwing up the question of &quot;what can we do to protect our own interests&quot; like Mark points out, diversification is something I&#039;ve long understood and believed.
It could end up being a blessing for smart marketers if the shaky marketers get thrown out out of the rankings, allowing new opportunities to open up for smart marketers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how things pan out from this.  After all EZA is (or was) considered a main weapon/tool for marketers, but let&#8217;s see, and things like this are good for throwing up the question of &#8220;what can we do to protect our own interests&#8221; like Mark points out, diversification is something I&#8217;ve long understood and believed.<br />
It could end up being a blessing for smart marketers if the shaky marketers get thrown out out of the rankings, allowing new opportunities to open up for smart marketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Excellent point. I followed this from your post at the WarriorForum. I wonder why many don&#039;t follow and comment on this. You know what - they are all afraid and &quot;kissing EzineArticles&quot; ass and don&#039;t want to say the truth. I think Chris is a hypocrite - he&#039;s using our articles to make tons of money but don&#039;t want to reward us. Your point is 100% true - if he wants us to write 2,000 word articles, no problem, he should put our resource boxes right up there - before the article begins or by the side of the article, instead of his adsense ads!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point. I followed this from your post at the WarriorForum. I wonder why many don&#8217;t follow and comment on this. You know what &#8211; they are all afraid and &#8220;kissing EzineArticles&#8221; ass and don&#8217;t want to say the truth. I think Chris is a hypocrite &#8211; he&#8217;s using our articles to make tons of money but don&#8217;t want to reward us. Your point is 100% true &#8211; if he wants us to write 2,000 word articles, no problem, he should put our resource boxes right up there &#8211; before the article begins or by the side of the article, instead of his adsense ads!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://mjthompson.net/420/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjthompson.net/?p=420#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I had the same reaction to Chris Knight&#039;s video, Mark. He didn&#039;t mention what percentage of all published and submitted articles are under 399 words, but I would be willing to bet that it is a high percentage. Especially compared to articles over 700 words. That would make it pretty obvious that there are going to be more of those articles in problem status. I have a couple of 600 word articles that get a 30% CTR. But for the most part, it&#039;s my shorter articles that get the clicks. Quite frankly, with his overuse of Adsense all over our article pages, it&#039;s a miracle that anyone reads our articles at all these days! That big block right after the title is a real killer, since it pushes the article itself almost below the fold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same reaction to Chris Knight&#8217;s video, Mark. He didn&#8217;t mention what percentage of all published and submitted articles are under 399 words, but I would be willing to bet that it is a high percentage. Especially compared to articles over 700 words. That would make it pretty obvious that there are going to be more of those articles in problem status. I have a couple of 600 word articles that get a 30% CTR. But for the most part, it&#8217;s my shorter articles that get the clicks. Quite frankly, with his overuse of Adsense all over our article pages, it&#8217;s a miracle that anyone reads our articles at all these days! That big block right after the title is a real killer, since it pushes the article itself almost below the fold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
